IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed011/970.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumption Risk and Family Labor Supply

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Pistaferri

    (Stanford University)

  • Itay Saporta Eksten

    (Stanford University)

  • Richard Blundell

    (University College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

We develop a life cycle framework with two individuals within the family (husband and wife) making decisions about household consumption and their individual labor supply, subject to uncertainty about offered market wages. The response of consumption to permanent wage shocks depends on two “smoothing” channels: smoothing through savings and smoothing through the two earners’ labor supply. We derive an econometric model that shows how the Frisch elasticities of labor supply, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution and a self insurance parameter can be identified and apply it to 1999-2007 PSID waves. Our findings highlight three key features of household insurance and family labor supply. First, The Frisch elasticity of labor supply of the second earner (in our case the wife) is at least twice as large as the Frisch elasticities of labor supply of the household head (in our case the working male). Second, estimates of the self insurance parameter suggest that the household is more insured than the insurance implied by a single riskless asset model. Third, the second earner is much more responsive not only to its own permanent wage shocks, but also to the second earner permanent wage shocks, implying a large average increase in labor supply of the second earner in response to an adverse permanent shock to the first earner’s wages.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Pistaferri & Itay Saporta Eksten & Richard Blundell, 2011. "Consumption Risk and Family Labor Supply," 2011 Meeting Papers 970, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed011:970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2011/paper_970.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed011:970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.