IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed010/634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Trade Reforms with Model with Heterogeneous Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Kim J. Ruhl

    (NYU Stern School of Business)

  • Timothy J. Kehoe

    (University of Minnesota)

Abstract

Theories in which firms have heterogeneous productivities, such as those of Melitz (2003) and Chaney (2008), have been successful in capturing this empirical regularity that the average exporting firm is larger than the average nonexporter, but they fail to capture the richness of the distributions of exporters and nonexporters. We develop a simple model in which firms face heterogeneous fixed costs as well as having heterogeneous productivities. With a C.E.S. utility function and a Pareto distribution of productivities, this model has analytical solutions independently of the functional form chosen for the distribution of fixed costs. We show how this model can be reinterpreted as a model of occupation choice between being a worker or a manager in the spirit of Lucas (1978), thus providing a model for studying the impact of changes in trade policy on income distribution. Unfortunately, industrial census data indicate that the distribution of firm sizes is more consistent with a log normal distribution of productivities than it is with a Pareto distribution. We can solve a model with a log normal distribution of productivity numerically, but this model lacks many of the stark features of the model with a Pareto distribution of productivities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim J. Ruhl & Timothy J. Kehoe, 2010. "Evaluating Trade Reforms with Model with Heterogeneous Firms," 2010 Meeting Papers 634, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed010:634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed010:634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.