IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Power of Print

Listed author(s):
  • Michelle Alexopoulos


    (Economics University of Toronto)

Beginning with the seminal work by Kydland and Prescott, standard business cycle theory has credited technology shocks with being a major source of business cycle fluctuations. Unfortunately, these shocks, by their nature, are hard to identify and measure. This paper utilizes new measures of technological progress based on publications in the field of technology to address two questions. First, what impact did information and communications general purpose technologies have on the U.S. economy in the postwar period? Second, if there is a significant impact, what sectors were most affected by these types of technology? To examine how information and communications technology (ICT) shocks affect the economy, I first create new measures of ICT technological change based on new information from the Library of Congress’ database, and examine their properties. The rationale for using these new book indicators is that, like patents, the introduction of new titles (excluding new editions) in the field of technology should be related to technological progress. Moreover, as Alexopoulos (2006) discusses, a potential advantage of using book indicators is that new books on technology (e.g., manuals) are likely to be written when the idea or product is first being utilized because publishers want to maximize their profits and recoup their costs associated with the publication. As a result, the timing between changes in technology captured by my indicators and economic activity should be much smaller than the corresponding lag when technological change is measured using research and development expenditures or patent indicators. ’ Next, I use these measures in vector autoregressions to explore how the economy responds to a technology shock. My approach for exploring the impact of technology shocks is closely related to the one used by Shea (1998). However, instead of using data on patents (or R&D), I create a new measure based on previously unstudied information on book titles in the fields of technology used in the U.S. economy. My findings indicate that changes in telecommunications and computer technologies did significantly affect U.S. productivity and GDP growth in both the short and long run. In particular, I find that, in response to a positive ICT technology shock, employment, total factor productivity and capital all increase at the aggregate level. However, not all sectors of the economy respond in the same way. Shocks to computer technology significantly affect GDP in the largest number of sectors, including manufacturing, retail and wholesale trade, telecommunications, transportation, and services. The increase following a positive shock is mostly due to the positive affect of the shock on Total Factor Productivity in the sector. Employment increases and capital increases appear to play a smaller role. Telecommunications shocks affect GDP in a smaller number of sectors (the Retail trade, Service, Transportation, Manufacturing and Construction Industries). Again, I find that the majority of the increase following a positive shock is attributable to the shock’s affect on the industry’s total factor productivity.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2006 Meeting Papers with number 865.

in new window

Date of creation: 03 Dec 2006
Handle: RePEc:red:sed006:865
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed006:865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.