Why Women Work: Disentangling the Role of Marriage Prospects and Intra-Household Behavior
It has been shown that women married to men brought up by working mothers are significantly more likely to work than women married to men whose mothers were housewives. Furthermore, shocks to an economy which increase the number of working women (such as WWII), and thereby also increase the proportion of men whose mothers work, have dynamic repercussions: they make it more attractive for women to work in the following generation and hence increase female labor force participation over time. This paper investigates why this is so. One possible explanation is that a man whose mother worked may prefer (or be preferred by) a working woman. In this case, the presence in society of a greater proportion of men with working mothers affects a womanâ€™s expectations and market skill acquisition decisions, increasing the odds of her working independently of the type of man she eventually marries. If so, the positive correlation between the working behavior of manâ€™s mother and that of his wife would primarily be due to marital selection. An alternative hypothesis centers instead on household behavior. In this view, a married womanâ€™s working behavior is not so much a response to investment decisions taken before marriage, but a result of interaction within the household. If so, the positive correlation between the working behavior of a manâ€™s mother and his wife is primarily the result of the different set of preferences and skills that the husband brings to the marriage if his mother worked that also make it more attractive for his wife to work. This paper develops a theoretical framework useful to analyze and distinguish between both channels and provides empirical evidence on their quantitative significance. In particular, using data from the General Social Survey (GSS) and the Census, this study shows that the main factor driving the result appears to- operate through womenâ€™s expectations and investment decisions. The consequences of this finding for policy analysis are analyzed and discussed
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2004|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA|
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed004:864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.