IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qsh/wpaper/229221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Expertise in an Age of Polarization: Evaluating Scientists? Political Awareness and Communication Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Nisbet, Matthew C
  • Ezra Markowitz

Abstract

During the George W. Bush administration, intense debate focused on the Administration?s interference with the work of government scientists. In this study, analyzing a May/June 2009 survey of members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), we evaluate the factors during this period that influenced scientists? awareness of political interference and their media outreach and communication activities. Controlling for demographic and professional-level influences, those members who were more liberal in their political outlook, who were frequent blog readers, and who felt strongly about global warming were substantially more likely to have heard ?a lot? about political interference. However, neither ideology, partisanship, nor opinion-intensity were predictive of the various media and communication behaviors assessed. Instead, the strongest predictor was the belief that media coverage was important for an individual?s career advancement. Implications for evaluating the expert community?s participation in future political debates are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nisbet, Matthew C & Ezra Markowitz, "undated". "Expertise in an Age of Polarization: Evaluating Scientists? Political Awareness and Communication Behaviors," Working Paper 229221, Harvard University OpenScholar.
  • Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:229221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholar.harvard.edu/matthewnisbet/node/229221
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:229221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Brandon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrssus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.