IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qsh/wpaper/221776.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Computational Pathology to Discriminate Benign from Malignant Intraductal Proliferations of the Breast

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, , Fei
  • Irshad, Humayun
  • Oh, , Eun-Yeong
  • Lerwill, , Melinda F.
  • Brachtel, , Elena F.
  • Jones, , Nicholas C.
  • Knoblauch, , Nicholas W.
  • Montaser-Kouhsari, , Laleh
  • Johnson, , Nicole B.
  • Rao, , Luigi K. F.
  • Faulkner-Jones, , Beverly
  • Wilbur, , David C.
  • Schnitt, , Stuart J.
  • Andrew H Beck

Abstract

The categorization of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast based on routine light microscopic examination of histopathologic sections is in many cases challenging, even for experienced pathologists. The development of computational tools to aid pathologists in the characterization of these lesions would have great diagnostic and clinical value. As a first step to address this issue, we evaluated the ability of computational image analysis to accurately classify DCIS and UDH and to stratify nuclear grade within DCIS. Using 116 breast biopsies diagnosed as DCIS or UDH from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), we developed a computational method to extract 392 features corresponding to the mean and standard deviation in nuclear size and shape, intensity, and texture across 8 color channels. We used L1-regularized logistic regression to build classification models to discriminate DCIS from UDH. The top-performing model contained 22 active features and achieved an AUC of 0.95 in cross-validation on the MGH data-set. We applied this model to an external validation set of 51 breast biopsies diagnosed as DCIS or UDH from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the model achieved an AUC of 0.86. The top-performing model contained active features from all color-spaces and from the three classes of features (morphology, intensity, and texture), suggesting the value of each for prediction. We built models to stratify grade within DCIS and obtained strong performance for stratifying low nuclear grade vs. high nuclear grade DCIS (AUC = 0.98 in cross-validation) with only moderate performance for discriminating low nuclear grade vs. intermediate nuclear grade and intermediate nuclear grade vs. high nuclear grade DCIS (AUC = 0.83 and 0.69, respectively). These data show that computational pathology models can robustly discriminate benign from malignant intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and may aid pathologists in the diagnosis and classification of these lesions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, , Fei & Irshad, Humayun & Oh, , Eun-Yeong & Lerwill, , Melinda F. & Brachtel, , Elena F. & Jones, , Nicholas C. & Knoblauch, , Nicholas W. & Montaser-Kouhsari, , Laleh & Johnson, , Nicole B. & R, "undated". "Computational Pathology to Discriminate Benign from Malignant Intraductal Proliferations of the Breast," Working Paper 221776, Harvard University OpenScholar.
  • Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:221776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholar.harvard.edu/humayun/node/221776
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:221776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Brandon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrssus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.