IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qsh/wpaper/165311.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender Bias or Gender Benefit? Estimating the Effect of Candidate Gender on Voting Behavior: A Regression Discontinuity Approach Using Close House Primaries

Author

Listed:
  • L. Jason Anastasopoulos
  • Morris E. Levy

Abstract

Can gender discrimination explain the limited growth of female election to the House of Representatives? Do female politicians lead to female voter empowerment? We answer these questions with a novel regression discontinuity design using close House primaries between 1982-2012. We find that female candidates do not effect political participation among women, but do effect participation among partisans. Female Republican candidates consistently depressed turnout among Democrats and had differential effects on Republican turnout across time. While they decreased turnout among Republicans in earlier elections, female Republican candidates increased turnout among Republicans in later elections. An analysis of the effect of female candidates on turnout by gender and party identification reveals that female candidates do not encourage women to vote. To the contrary, they were more likely to increase turnout among men. Female Democratic candidates increased turnout only among male Democrats while female Republican candidates differentially increased turnout only among male Independents.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Jason Anastasopoulos & Morris E. Levy, 1969. "Gender Bias or Gender Benefit? Estimating the Effect of Candidate Gender on Voting Behavior: A Regression Discontinuity Approach Using Close House Primaries," Working Paper 165311, Harvard University OpenScholar.
  • Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:165311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholar.harvard.edu/janastas/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////node/165311
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:165311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Brandon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrssus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.