IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Minority Rights in the Indian Constituent Assembly Debates, 1946-1950


  • Rochana Bajpai


This paper focuses on a neglected aspect of India's constitutional history: the withdrawal of political safeguards for religious minorities during the making of the Indian Constitution. It analyses arguments about group preferential provisions in debates as well as democracy, as provisions for minority representation entailed departures from the principle of territorial representation. The overriding consideration in nationalist discourse of this period was, however, the impact of minority safeguards on national integrity and cohesion. In nationalist opinion, preferential provisions were regarded as legitimate only in the case of certain groups - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - and only for a specific purpose, that of ameliorating the social and economic disabilities of backward sections. This nationalist discourse influenced the forms in which group preferential provisions were incorporated into the Indian Constitution: as temporary, self liquidating measures for the 'backward sections'. The fact that there was no principled defense in Congress opinion for such provisions in the case of religious minorities enables us understand why safeguards for religious minorities, incorporated in the first draft of the Constitution, came to be removed in the final stages of Constitution making. The paper thus argues that an analysis of political discourse is crucial for understanding political outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rochana Bajpai, "undated". "Minority Rights in the Indian Constituent Assembly Debates, 1946-1950," QEH Working Papers qehwps30, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps30

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Narayan, Deepa & Pritchett, Lant, 1999. "Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(4), pages 871-897, July.
    2. Greif, Avner, 1994. "Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 912-950, October.
    3. Woolcock, Michael & Narayan, Deepa, 2000. "Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 15(2), pages 225-249, August.
    4. Ostrom, Elinor, 1996. "Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1073-1087, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rachel Crawford). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.