IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/855.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Earnings Inequality within and Between Levels of Responsibility in Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Christoper Ferrall

Abstract

Responsibility is a scarce resource--we can't all be chiefs. This paper studies how responsibility was allocated among engineers between 1961 and 1986 using the Current Population Survey and a Bureau of Labor Statistics salary survey that classifies workers by level within their firm. The percentage of engineers assigned to low levels fell until 1976 and rose thereafter. This pattern follows the distribution of experience in the profession, as measured in the CPS. Overall earnings inequality rose during two periods, the early 1970s and 1980s. Inequality within levels, however, steadily fell after 1976, so the later and sharper increase in inequality reflects a widening gap between job levels, This suggest that firms are better able to assign workers responsibility when the profession is relatively young; the match between the supply and demand of responsibility is better, Technological change biased against high level jobs does not appear to be a major factor in the changes since the mid 1970s.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoper Ferrall, 1992. "Earnings Inequality within and Between Levels of Responsibility in Engineering," Working Paper 855, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_855.pdf
    File Function: First version 1992
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • J4 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.