IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/1544.html

Measure Frictional Sorting

Author

Listed:
  • Shouyong Shi

Abstract

This paper constructs an index to measure sorting in a two-sided market with matching friction. The index uses the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the matching partners for each individual and incorporates matching failures as a mass point at the lowest type of the partners. The area between this cdf and the cdf in the efficient allocation without friction represents the reduction in sorting. The sorting index is equal to one minus the aggregate reduction in sorting normalized by the amount under uniform matching. In contrast to most measures of sorting in the literature, the sorting index captures the effect of matching failures and compares the matching partner's type with the ideal type instead of the individual's own type. Relative to this sorting index, the correlation coefficient of matched types tends to over-estimate sorting when sorting is positive. The over-estimation increases sharply when matching failures increase or when the market becomes more imbalanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Shouyong Shi, 2026. "Measure Frictional Sorting," Working Paper 1544, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:1544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.queensu.ca/sites/econ.queensu.ca/files/wpaper/qed_wp_1544.pdf
    File Function: First version 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • J60 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:1544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.