Dissonance, Dissent and Discovery
Scientific revolutions require sound evidence overwhelmingly contradictory to the prevailing paradigm, and willingness to believe such evidence. Histories of science have traditionally concentrated on the first factor. The second factor indicates, however, that attitude change may play an equally important role. This paper conjectures that a model of attitude change known as cognitive dissonance can be fruitfully applied to the philosophy and history of science. This paper conjectures that resolution of dissonance in science, leading up to adoption of a new paradigm, follows a particular sequence. Cognitive dissonance is applied to Merton's theory of multiples. The paper concludes with a capsule view of the Keynesian Revolution in economics as a process of dissonance, dissent and discovery.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1973|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (613) 533-2250
Fax: (613) 533-6668
Web page: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.