IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Dissonance, Dissent and Discovery

Listed author(s):
  • Shlomo Maital
Registered author(s):

    Scientific revolutions require sound evidence overwhelmingly contradictory to the prevailing paradigm, and willingness to believe such evidence. Histories of science have traditionally concentrated on the first factor. The second factor indicates, however, that attitude change may play an equally important role. This paper conjectures that a model of attitude change known as cognitive dissonance can be fruitfully applied to the philosophy and history of science. This paper conjectures that resolution of dissonance in science, leading up to adoption of a new paradigm, follows a particular sequence. Cognitive dissonance is applied to Merton's theory of multiples. The paper concludes with a capsule view of the Keynesian Revolution in economics as a process of dissonance, dissent and discovery.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 126.

    in new window

    Length: 28
    Date of creation: 1973
    Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:126
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

    Phone: (613) 533-2250
    Fax: (613) 533-6668
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.