IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/4610.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancement of Coffee Quality in Rwanda: A Stakeholder Analysis of Government Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn P. Jenkins

    (Department of Economics, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada and Cyprus International University, North Cyprus)

  • Ludovic Mbakop

    (Department of Economics, Eastern Mediterranean University Famagusta, North Cyprus via Mersin 10 Turkey)

  • Mikhail Miklyaev

    (Department of Economics, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada and Cambridge Resources International Inc.)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, Rwanda has positioned itself as a leading producer of specialty coffee. The shift away from ordinary coffee began in the early 2000s and was buoyed by international donors, NGOs and the government. They all supported the nascent specialty coffee industry by providing a combination of technical assistance and funding to invest in coffee washing stations. Coffee washing stations (CWS) are a pivotal piece of the value chain in Rwanda since it is where ordinary coffee undergoes a process that turn it into specialty coffee. The policy of shifting to specialty coffee has been significantly beneficial to Rwanda. However, there was a rush to build a large number of CWS throughout the country which has resulted in an over capacity of these plants and fierce competition among them for the purchase of cherry coffee from farmers. In an attempt to shore up the industry the Government implemented a zoning policy which effectively is a trade barrier to artificially maintain a high margin between the input price of cherry coffee and the sales price of coffee received by the CWS. This study uses a cost-benefit analysis to estimate the economic welfare loss to Rwanda of these policies. Over a ten year period the present value of the economic loss is estimated to be $73 million. An increased competition in the market for cherry coffee would raise the price of cherry coffee at the expense of the profits of CWS owners. If such a policy were implemented coffee growers could potentially receive up to 150% more from their sales of cherry coffee, or $45 million per year. These enhanced revenues would allow famers to finance the replanting of their coffee fees and maintain the sustainability of this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn P. Jenkins & Ludovic Mbakop & Mikhail Miklyaev, 2023. "Enhancement of Coffee Quality in Rwanda: A Stakeholder Analysis of Government Policies," Development Discussion Papers 2023-11, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_4610.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Coffee value chain; coffee washing station; specialty coffee; coffee zoning policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.