IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/4588.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Integrated Investment Appraisal of a Irrigation Project in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Aidah Nanyonjo

    (Cambridge Resources International Inc.)

  • Mikhail Miklyaev

    (Department of Economics, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L3N6 and Cambridge Resources International Inc.)

Abstract

This study is an instructive tool in the preparation and appraisal of Irrigation projects, supplements the Public Investment Management Guidelines (PIM Guidelines) and the Public Investment Management Manual (PIM Manual). It is designed to aid public officials working within the irrigation sector especially those responsible for the planning, appraisal, development, selection, budgeting, and implementation of Irrigation projects. The IPAM provides guidance on the methodology and best practices employed in the appraisal of Irrigation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Aidah Nanyonjo & Mikhail Miklyaev, 2022. "An Integrated Investment Appraisal of a Irrigation Project in Zimbabwe," Development Discussion Papers 2022-10, JDI Executive Programs.
    • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_4588.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cost Benefit Analysis; Irrigation; Public Investment; Zimbabwe;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.