IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/4524.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Exploratory Study of the Water Standpipe-Vendor System in Jakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Shugart

    (Independent Consultant)

Abstract

This report is based on exploratory field interviews and observations that took place in North and West Jakarta during a three-week period in June-July 1991.The study was carried out in response to two recent policy changes with regard to the way that water is supplied to poor households in Jakarta: first, a dramatic expansion in the number of standpipes under PAM Jaya's hidran contoh program; and second, the liberalization of water sales from household to household. In Jakarta, the price that the final consumer pays for water sold by vendors is extremely high compared with the price of water from a house tap. The average price of tap water for a household that consumes 1000 liters per day was Rp 270 per cubic meter in July 1991, the time of the present study. In contrast, water purchased from vendors in North Jakarta might well cost Rp 2000/m3 or in West Jakarta Rp 4000/m3. It is important to know whether this price can be lowered, or whether there is another, better way to deliver water to poor families. The study starts from the premise that policies can be formulated better if one has a clearer understanding of how the standpipe-vendor system functions. A crucial issue, for instance, is the degree to which standpipe and vendor prices are set in a competitive manner. The kinds of policies the government should adopt will depend to a large degree on the answer to this question. The studies conclude that the markup charged by vendors – ranging from Rp 1300/m3 to over Rp 3500/m3 – is due to their actual costs, and by far the predominant cost is their labor. The fixed cost, the rental (or equivalent) of a pushcart, is less important. This usually costs Rp 500-750 per day; spread over 1.5-3.0 cubic meters a day of water delivered, the cost per cubic meter is only Rp 170-500. The study of the standpipe-vendor system stresses the importance of competition as a way of making the system responsive to the varied needs of consumers and of ensuring that prices are kept at the lowest level possible. The main objective of government intervention in this case should be to set up the system in such a way that the beneficial effects of private ingenuity and competition are maximized.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Shugart, 1991. "An Exploratory Study of the Water Standpipe-Vendor System in Jakarta," Development Discussion Papers 1991-15, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_4524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumila Gulyani & Debabrata Talukdar & R. Mukami Kariuki, 2005. "Universal (Non)service? Water Markets, Household Demand and the Poor in Urban Kenya," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1247-1274, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Jakarta; standpipe; vendor; households; poor; consumers; price; water;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.