IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/255.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Environmental Assessment Act’S Impact On Business In Ontario

Author

Listed:
  • John Evans
  • Richard Bodell
  • Glenn Jenkins

    () (Queen's University, Kingston, On, Canada)

Abstract

An improved physical environment would undoubtedly yield gross benefits to the residents of Ontario. The really challenging question is how should environmental policy be formulated and implemented in order to achieve these benefits with the least amount of social cost? There is a net social benefit from environmental policy only if the gross social benefits of reduced pollution exceed the social costs of achieving it. Our analysis of the likely effects of the Environmental Assessment Act leads us to conclude that the potential benefits are at best elusive, and possibly non-existent. The potential costs, however, can be identified with some precision, and could be substantial. The next social cost will be borne not only by business firms investing in Ontario, but also by the residents of the Province in general. We conclude, therefore, that the Environmental Assessment Act is not a socially efficient method of implementing environmental policy.

Suggested Citation

  • John Evans & Richard Bodell & Glenn Jenkins, 1977. "The Environmental Assessment Act’S Impact On Business In Ontario," Development Discussion Papers 1977-07, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Assessment; Ontario;

    JEL classification:

    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bahman Kashi). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.