IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pur/prukra/1185.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reg FD and the Competitiveness of All-Star Analysts

Author

Listed:
  • Bagnoli, Mark
  • Watts, Susan G.
  • Zhang, Yong

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) on the competitive advantage of All-Star analysts. We find that Institutional Investor All-Americans, chosen by the votes of institutional investors based on overall helpfulness to the buy-side, experienced a significant increase in turnover during the implementation and immediate aftermath of Reg FD. We do not observe a similar change in the Institutional Investor buy-side rankings of non-U.S. analysts or in the Wall Street Journal s Best on the Street rankings which are based solely on returns generated from the analyst s public stock recommendations. Furthermore, the significant change in All-American rankings is concentrated in those sectors identified by DIRI and Hutton (2005) as being most affected by Reg FD. By 2003, the competitive environment for All-Americans had stabilized, with turnover returning to (approximately) pre-Reg FD levels. This suggests that within a few years, All-Americans had built a new competitive advantage stressing aspects of performance less dependent on privileged communication with management.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagnoli, Mark & Watts, Susan G. & Zhang, Yong, 2005. "Reg FD and the Competitiveness of All-Star Analysts," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1185, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://business.purdue.edu/research/Working-papers-series/Year-2005/1185.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Business PHD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kspurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.