IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Do Differences in Transparency Affect Trading Costs? Evidence from U.S. Corporate, Municipal and Treasury Bond Markets

Listed author(s):
  • Chakravarty, Sugato
  • Sarkar, Asani

We compare trading costs in the transparent U.S. Treasury bond market with the less transparent U.S. corporate and municipal bond markets, based on newly available transaction data. We estimate that the mean bid-ask spread per $100 par value is 23 cents for municipal bonds, 21 cents for corporate bonds and 11 cents for Treasury bonds. But after controlling for interest rate risk, credit risk and trading activity, we find that the bid-ask spread is not significantly different between the three markets. Our findings suggest that markets with different levels of transparency may nevertheless have similar trading costs. Finally, we examine why institutions sometimes trade without dealers, and find that the relative volume of directly negotiated trades in a bond decreases in its bid-ask spread, interest rate risk and adverse selection risk and increases in its activity level.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Purdue University, Department of Economics in its series Purdue University Economics Working Papers with number 1138.

in new window

Length: 46 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2000
Handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1138
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Krannert Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Krannert PHD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.