IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pur/prukra/1118.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Alternative Methods to Estimate Corporate and Industry Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Brush, Thomas H.
  • James, Constance R.
  • Bromiley, Philip

Abstract

Recent studies of the relative size of corporate and industry effects have used ANOVA, Variance Components Analysis and Simultaneous Equations (Roquebert, Philips and Westfall 1996; McGahan and Porter, 1997a; 1997b, Brush, Bromiley and Hendrikx, forthcoming). This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques for evaluating the relative importance of effects. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we empirically compare these techniques. Based on bias and precision of estimation, the simultaneous equation estimates and particularly standardized beta provide the best estimates of effect size.

Suggested Citation

  • Brush, Thomas H. & James, Constance R. & Bromiley, Philip, 1998. "Comparing Alternative Methods to Estimate Corporate and Industry Effects," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1118, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Business PHD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kspurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.