IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/indrel/250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selection for Military Service in the Vietnam Era

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua D. Angrist

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

In discussions of the incidence of Vietnam era military service, it is often observed that blacks were over-represented among draftees in the early 1970's. The racial composition of the armed forces, however, was determined jointly by armed forces eligibility criteria and voluntary enlistment as well as by the failure of draftees to avoid conscription. The interaction of these selection criteria makes it impossible to use the armed forces racial mix as prima facie evidence regarding the burden of conscription. In this paper, a modeling strategy is developed that may be used to identify some of the parameters affecting the process of selection for military service. The approach taken here exploits the fact that in the early 1970's, the risk of conscription was randomly allocated in a series of lotteries. Data on enlistments during the 1971 draft lottery are fit to a behavioral model using the technique of Modified Minimum Chi-Square. The empirical work shows that although nonwhites were more likely than whites to be drafted and less likely to meet armed forces eligibility criteria, they were also more likely to consider military service an attractive alternative to civilian life. An additional and related finding is that the draft induced proportionately more whites than nonwhites to enlist. The elasticity of white enlistments with respect to the probability of conscription is shown to be twice as large as the elasticity of nonwhite enlistment. Thus, other things equal, conscription of equal numbers of whites and nonwhites may actually reduce nonwhite representation in the armed forces.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua D. Angrist, 1989. "Selection for Military Service in the Vietnam Era," Working Papers 630, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp015m60qr89q/1/250.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    draft lottery; multiple selection criteria minimum chi-square;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.