IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grouped Data Estimation and Testing in Simple Labor Supply Models


  • Joshua D. Angrist

    (Princeton University)


Labor supply research has not yet produced a clear statement of the size of the labor supply elasticity nor how it should be measured. Measurement error in hourly wage data and the use of inappropriate identifying assumptions can account for the poor performance of some empirical labor supply models. I propose here a generalization of Wald's method of fitting straight lines that is robust to measurement error, imposes mild testable identifying assumptions, and is useful for the estimation of life-cycle labor supply models with panel data. A convenient Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) equivalent of the generalized Wald estimator is presented and a TSLS over-identification test statistic is shown to be the test statistic for equality of alternative Wald estimates of the same parameter. These results are applied to labor supply models using a sample of continuously employed prime-age males. Labor supply elasticities from the two best-fitting models that pass tests of over-identifying restrictions range from 0.6 to 0.8 . A test for measurement error based on the difference between generalized Wald and Analysis of Covariance estimators is also proposed. Application of the test indicates that measurement error can account for low or negative Analysis of Covariance estimates of labor supply elasticities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua D. Angrist, 1988. "Grouped Data Estimation and Testing in Simple Labor Supply Models," Working Papers 614, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:234

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item


    labor supply; grouped data; Wald estimators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.