Mutual Funds and Segregated Funds: A Comparison
Mutual Funds are the most common form of investment for the average household. They offer a fair amount of return for a limited amount of risk. Segregated Funds, which are, simply put, mutual funds with additional features, have grown in popularity as of late. It is something of great interest to understand the risks and returns of the fund types and better grasp the advantages and disadvantages to each. By selecting 5 mutual and segregated funds of similar investment patterns and breakdowns, and performing various statistical analyses on their prices and returns, this paper verifies which fund type would be best. VaR analysis and probability distribution modeling allows for this paper to demonstrate how to best model the results and, thus, putting forth the positives and negatives of each fund. In the end, one finds that the overall results show some inconclusiveness and calls for further study with additional factors. The differences, if any, are small and other factors, such as management/broker fees and taxes, could play a role. This paper gives important insight to what one can expect from these investment types and gives allows one to better comprehend the features of each, so that one can become a more informed and shrewd investor which can only be seen as a benefit.
|Date of creation:||29 Oct 2007|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany|
Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.