IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Review of the utilization of a Portuguese public hospital

Listed author(s):
  • Almeida, Anabela
  • Serrasqueiro, Zélia
  • Rogeiro, Ana

This paper reports on some important findings of a study conducted in Covilhã/ Portugal on appropriateness of hospital admission and in-hospital days in a Portuguese hospital using an adapted version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol – a review tool for hospital utilization. This analysis showed a significant rate of inappropriateness in admission (24, 6%) and days of stay (37, 4%) and it also suggested a low rate of use of the override options. It was possible to identify the conservative attitude as the most common cause of inappropriate admissions and days of stay. This study demonstrates that a high proportion of admissions and days of stay are related to patients who could have been attended at other levels of the health care system such as outpatient consultations. The analysis made it possible to identify and to explore some variables correlated to the levels of inappropriateness and to the causes of inappropriateness or levels of health care required by the patients.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 6160.

in new window

Date of creation: 2007
Publication status: Published in Acta Médica Portuguesa II.19(2006): pp. 381-386
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6160
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.