IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/53756.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposition 4, Tax Reduction Mirage: An Exploratory Note on Its Potential Spending and Tax Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Cebula, Richard
  • Chevlin, Linda

Abstract

What would the true government expenditure and tax burden im­pacts of California's Proposition 4 likely be if it (or its equivalent) were enacted in all 50 states? What happened to actual state plus local government expenditures per capita over the period 1970-1976 is examined. Next, we examine what would have happened to such expenditures (per capita) if Proposition 4 had been in effect over the same period. Comparing the results reveals that Proposition 4 might have exercised little impact over per capita state plus local spending levels. This implies that such legislation might not have resulted in significant tax reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cebula, Richard & Chevlin, Linda, 1980. "Proposition 4, Tax Reduction Mirage: An Exploratory Note on Its Potential Spending and Tax Impacts," MPRA Paper 53756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53756/1/MPRA_paper_53756.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cebula, Richard, 1985. "Was Proposition 4 Really a Tax Reduction Mirage? A Correction and Reinterpretation of Earlier Findings," MPRA Paper 53119, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Richard J. Cebula, 1987. "Was Proposition 4 Really a Tax Reduction Mirage?A Correction and Reinterpretation of Previous Findings," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 107-108, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax burden; expenditure patterns; expenditure limitations; tax limitations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.