IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/48544.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of the Judicial Review of the Decisions of the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Šramelová, Silvia
  • Šupáková, Andrea

Abstract

The article provides an analysis of the most important judgments rendered by Slovak courts at the end of 2010, in the course of 2011 and at the beginning of 2012. The article focuses solely on judicial review of decisions issued by the National Competition Authority of the Slovak Republic. Slovak courts dealt with several key issues concerning public enforcement of competition law such as: the application of the so-called ‘general clause’; competences of the Slovak competition authority in regulated sectors; and the application of the economic continuity test. Some of the conclusions resulting from these judgments may be considered disputable. It may be argued, in particular, that they may jeopardize the effective enforcement of competition law in the Slovak Republic. At the same time, the discussed jurisprudence has managed to clarify a number of key issues which had been subject to debate for a number of years. The article presents a review of these judgments, summarizes their key conclusions and considers their possible impact on the system of public enforcement of competition law in the Slovak Republic. The article is divided into a number of parts, each of which covers an individual case, the titles of which refers to the main topic that was under discussion in the presented judgment.

Suggested Citation

  • Šramelová, Silvia & Šupáková, Andrea, 2012. "Development of the Judicial Review of the Decisions of the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic," MPRA Paper 48544, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:48544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48544/1/MPRA_paper_48544.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic continuity test; mitigating circumstance; competence; sectoral regulation; general clause; reduction of fine; unlawful operation on the market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:48544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.