IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Das „saldenmechanische Modell“ von Fritz Helmedag und die Empirie
[Fritz Helmedag’s model of the mechanism of net balances and the real data]

Listed author(s):
  • Quaas, Georg

The mechanism of net balances – called “Saldenmechanik” in German – was the subject of a theory presented by Wolfgang Sützel in the 50ies of the last century. Stützel was “concerned with money flows between economic units and with net changes in the money holdings of these units as a result of such flows.” (Hein 1959) The name of Helmedag’s model refers to this tradition of macroeconomic thinking. From a point of view on the outside, Helemdag’s model of net balances can be characterized by an aggregate level comparable to the macroeconomic IS-model, but instead of specifying consumption and investment functions it is focused on income distribution and taxes – including their influence on national income and employment. Because the mathematical part of the model consists of identities only, it is similar to some equations of the modern system of national accounts (SNA), but without claiming and reaching their accuracy and richness. This feature makes it difficult to confront the model with real data. For this purpose it has to be embed in the SNA by adding some variables and by interpreting others in the light of some structural similarities between equations of the model and some equations of the SNA. Under these conditions, Helmedag’s model can be confronted with real data and its main conclusions can be tested empirically. Ignoring the well known national and personal saving rates, Helmedag’s model utilizes different saving rates: The profit-saving rate is understood as the saving of profits as a percentage of profit income; the wage-saving rate is defined as the saving of wages as a percentage of wage income. Both rates are no part of the SNA as it is commonly understood. Therefore it was necessary to compute these special saving rates empirically on the basis of an additional socio-economic data set. As expected, it proofed right that profit-saving rates are usually higher than wage-saving rates. With these results, the model could interpreted empirically. It became evident that some of the consequences drawn by Helmedag and poured by him into the treasure chamber of inexpensive political recommendations were seriously wrong. Especially the proposition that indirect taxes (value added taxes) have no effect on national income and employment can be regarded as falsified. Hein, John (1959) on W. Stützel: Volkswirtschaftliche Saldenmechanik: Ein Beitrag zur Geldtheorie. In: The American Economic Review, Vol. 49, No. 5 (Dec 1959), pp.1088-1089.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 19645.

in new window

Date of creation: Jun 2007
Publication status: Published in Wirtschaftsdienst 00436275.87 Hef(2007): pp. 406-412
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:19645
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Lucke, Bernd, 2006. "Schlechter Wein in alten Schläuchen: Eine Replik auf Helmedag," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW – German National Library of Economics / Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 86(3), pages 204-206.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:19645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.