Business Investment, Cycles and Tax Policy: Are We Investing Too Little?
Some analysts have argued that bubble excesses of the late-1990s led to excessive real investment, and that an important consequence was that capital formation has been depressed since then, as firms have let production catch up with the excessive capital stock. While this description broadly fits the pattern of business fixed investment from the mid-1990s at least until 2003, it may be overstated. The business cycle and tax policy have played more important roles in explaining the pattern of investment activity. The resumption of investment, so long as tax policy changes in 2003 are maintained, suggests the excess capacity argument is no longer valid, if it ever was.
|Date of creation:||31 Jan 2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Research Buzz 1.2(2006): pp. 1-1|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:17832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.