IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/125332.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Hidden Adjustment: Re-examining the Capital-Labor-Mix in the Harrod-neutral Growth Model

Author

Listed:
  • de la Fonteijne, Marcel R.

Abstract

For several decades, it has been acknowledged that the conventional implementation of capital- and labor-augmenting technical progress within CES production functions gives rise to a fundamental paradox: either the production function must be Cobb-Douglas, or technical progress must be labor-augmenting only. Despite this inconsistency—commonly referred to as the “Cobb-Douglas or labor-augmenting-only paradox”—the approach remains widely used in modern growth models. In this paper, we revisit this theoretical issue through the lens of the Modern Universal Growth Theory (MUGT). MUGT rejects all existing formulations of neutral and non-neutral technical progress and offers a revised implementation that resolves the paradox. Within this framework, economic growth is represented as partially exogenous, through technical change, and partially endogenous, through capital accumulation. We derive explicit expressions to translate total factor productivity (TFP) into measurable output growth, establishing a coherent link between productivity dynamics and long-run economic performance. The central conclusion of MUGT is that no production function can yield a Balanced Growth Path (BGP) unless the capital-labor mix is explicitly adjusted over time. In this sense, MUGT exposes a structural limitation of all traditional growth models and provides a general framework to overcome it. A key contribution of this paper is the analysis of so-called Harrod-neutral (labor-augmenting) technical progress. We demonstrate that, despite its apparent simplicity, this approach implicitly requires a continuous adjustment of the capital-labor mix—a hidden mechanism that has remained largely unexamined. By revealing this adjustment, we not only explain the inner workings of Harrod's model, but also show that the same hidden mechanism exists across all combinations of capital- and labor-augmenting progress. This insight strengthens the case for adopting the MUGT as a consistent and transparent foundation for growth theory, in which each growth parameter has a clear, consistent, and economically meaningful interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • de la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2025. "The Hidden Adjustment: Re-examining the Capital-Labor-Mix in the Harrod-neutral Growth Model," MPRA Paper 125332, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/125332/1/MPRA_paper_125332.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2018. "Why the concept of Hicks, Harrod, Solow neutral and even non-neutral augmented technical progress is flawed in principle in any economic model," MPRA Paper 107730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. de la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2024. "The inconsistency if the production function is a homogeneous degree ν CES function, solving the problem and the presentation of the Modern Universal Growth Theory; The foundation of economic growth t," MPRA Paper 121867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      JEL classification:

      • E00 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - General
      • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
      • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
      • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.