IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pit/wpaper/443.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Student Responses to the Changing Cost of Post-Secondary Education

Author

Listed:
  • Erin Kaplan

Abstract

At a time when many public institutions are raising tuition rates in order to make up for decreasing state funding it is particularly important to understand how tuition rates affect the education and labor market decisions of students. The existing literature dealing with the cost of education focuses primarily on two outcome variables: school enrollment numbers and time to graduation. While these outcomes are undoubtedly useful for university administrators, this focus provides an incomplete picture of how students adapt to changes in the cost of education. Using state variation in tuition and financial aid this study examines a wider variety of student responses and develops a simple model to illustrate tradeoffs between formal human capital accumulation and labor market participation. My empirical analysis, however, does provides only limited evidence that post-secondary education costs affect student labor force participation. This lack of empirical evidence may result from one of several data limitations, including small sample size, low levels of average variation in the cost of post-secondary education, and a weak correlation between average public tuition and state financial aid expenditures and the actual costs facing individual students. Despite these limitations, my findings indicate that increases in the availability of need-based financial aid is positively correlated with full-time enrollment in both 2-year as well as private institutions, and that increases in tuition are negatively correlated with full-time enrollment.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin Kaplan, 2011. "Student Responses to the Changing Cost of Post-Secondary Education," Working Paper 443, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Jan 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:pit:wpaper:443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pit:wpaper:443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/depghus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.