IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/197704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Growth, Employment and Wage Performance in the Manufacturing Sector : A Comparative Study of Japan and the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe M. Medalla

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

Abstract

This paper looks into the "growth vs. equity" issue by comparing wages and employment in the manufacturing sector in the Philippines and in Prewar Japan (with special emphasis on the period before 1920). On the whole, it seems that the growth of the manufacturing sector contributed more to increased inequality in the Philippines than in Japan. To some extent, this might have been due to the effects of government policies in the Philippines. Thus, changes in policies may lead to both increased growth and reduced inequality. It is also very possible, however, that the growth of the manufacturing sector in the Philippines contributed more to increased inequality than in Japan (or failed to make for a narrowing of income disparities) because of more basic and non-policy induced factors. The differences between the size-structures of factory employment in the Philippines and in Prewar Japan, for example, are not as striking as suggested by a superficial comparison of factory statistics of the two economies. The major dissimilarities between the manufacturing sectors of the two economies can be found in the unorganized sub-sectors and the rather early setting in of dualism in Philippine manufacturing. As such, nothing short of a sustained boom in export of manufactures may be required to make growth and equity objectives complementary.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe M. Medalla, 1977. "Growth, Employment and Wage Performance in the Manufacturing Sector : A Comparative Study of Japan and the Philippines," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 197704, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.