IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2025-63.html

Utilization of Inpatient Care in the Philippines: Evidence from Social Health Insurance Claims Data

Author

Listed:
  • Hesham Mohamed Hagag, Sarah Reem D.
  • Rodriguez, Henrietta Marie M.
  • Ho, Frances Dominique V.
  • Uy, Jhanna
  • Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T.

Abstract

Inequities in access to healthcare are pervasive in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), manifesting as large socio-economic gradients in healthcare utilization and, subsequently, disparities in population outcomes. LMICs also often confront inefficient health systems, partly due to under-investments in primary health care (PHC)—an approach that drains resources and worsens inequity. The Philippines is no exception to these issues. Previous research has demonstrated (1) significant disparities in health service utilization among the richest and poorest regions, and (2) a prevalence of potentially preventable hospital admissions due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs)—a key marker of health system efficiency. Hospitals and curative care account for a large portion of the country’s health expenditure, while out-of-pocket spending remains high. The Universal Health Care Act of 2019 presents an opportunity for the country to implement structural health system reform, beginning with efforts to establish health financing mechanisms that improve equity in access to health services and enhance health system efficiency. Given this, there is an urgent need for monitoring and evaluation systems to inform strategic purchasing. Large-scale and granular data are required to analyze utilization and provider performance to truly understand the magnitude of health system inequities and inefficiencies. To this end, using the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation inpatient eClaims dataset comprised of 86 million data points, this paper (1) analyzed inpatient care utilization and its associated costs, and (2) measured the burden of potentially preventable hospital admissions due to ACSCs. Overall, PhilHealth spends more on inpatient claims, and the number of inpatient claims has consistently increased. Certain geographic regions exhibit high inpatient care utilization, which may indicate high inpatient demand, while low utilization of inpatient care in other areas may signal systemic barriers in financial and physical accessibility to care. As reimbursements have decreased, hospital charges have significantly increased, diminishing the support value of PhilHealth; this has likely contributed to entrenched disparities in care utilization among the rich and poor. Furthermore, ACSCs account for about 33 percent of all hospital claims and approximately 35 percent of reimbursements, adding to the financial and health system strain that could potentially be mitigated with effective PHC. The proportion of ACSCs is generally higher in rural areas compared to urban areas, highlighting gaps in PHC systems. Measuring the utilization of inpatient services through large-scale and granular claims data presents an opportunity to inform strategic purchasing policies. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesham Mohamed Hagag, Sarah Reem D. & Rodriguez, Henrietta Marie M. & Ho, Frances Dominique V. & Uy, Jhanna & Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T., 2025. "Utilization of Inpatient Care in the Philippines: Evidence from Social Health Insurance Claims Data," Discussion Papers DP 2025-63, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-63
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/utilization-of-inpatient-care-in-the-philippines-evidence-from-social-health-insurance-claims-data
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Ralph M. Abrigo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.