IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2025-27.html

Kabayarang Sapat, Serbisyong Tapat, DRG Dapat: Transitioning from PhilHealth All Case Rates to a Fairer, Responsive, and Transparent Provider Payment System (A Retrospective Policy Analysis of the All Case Rates from 2018 to 2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Siy Van, Vanessa T.
  • Uy, Jhanna
  • Tomas, Therese Jules P.
  • Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T.

Abstract

In the Philippines, out-of-pocket or direct payments made by patients have persistently accounted for nearly half of the country’s health spending, indicating the financial burden experienced in accessing care. Since 2013, PhilHealth has paid accredited public and private providers for inpatient services using a case-based payment scheme called “All Case Rates” (ACR), which establishes a fixed case rate for the costs of treating a disease or procedure. Recognizing the limitations of ACR, PhilHealth was mandated to shift to a prospective payment system based on Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) for inpatient cases. Under DRG, patients are classified into groups based on demographic information, clinical presentations, and all procedures performed during their stay. Each DRG has an associated average payment amount that corresponds to the resources used to treat patients, depending on case complexity. Through a literature review and thematic analysis, the Philippine ACR was analyzed across six characteristics of provider payment systems: (1) sufficiency of payment rates, (2) bundling of services, (3) payment schedules, (4) performance measurement, (5) transparent adjustments, and (6) accountability mechanisms. The design and features of DRGs are also discussed by presenting how other countries navigated their transitions and highlighting lessons learned for Philippine implementation. This was supplemented by conducting quantitative analyses of available PhilHealth claims and financial data from 2024. As a result, the data used in the study is only up to 2023. The use of data from this period aligns with the study's goal to provide PhilHealth with a baseline on the features of ACR that could be improved by a DRG system. Three structural and design features of ACR were found to lead to inadequate and unresponsive payment rates: (1) The flat case rate per disease or procedure does not realistically reflect the services required to treat patients with varying clinical complexities, (2) Payment rates are not linked to hospitals’ organizational service utilization or performance in delivering quality healthcare, and (3) ACR lacks mechanisms for systematically updating payment rates, and opaque adjustment processes erode public trust in PhilHealth policies and reforms. Consequently, costs exceeding ACR payments are passed onto patients with comorbidities and severe illnesses—disproportionately affecting the poor, elderly, and those in conflict-affected areas. DRGs have the potential to transform the health financing system toward achieving universal healthcare goals. DRG-based payments account for the complexity of treatment and resource use associated with patients’ clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Coupled with a prospective global budget (spending target) based on facility case mix and patient volume, PhilHealth payments can incentivize the efficient and quality delivery of healthcare services. Updates or adjustments to the DRG classification scheme and payment rates are based on clear clinical criteria. Therefore, DRGs can provide PhilHealth with an opportunity to engage with different stakeholders and transparently report progress toward providing Filipinos with financial risk protection. The experiences of countries with advanced DRG systems demonstrate that successful adoption is not limited to developing technical capacity, such as the information technology needed to routinely collect hospital data, update the grouping software, and adjust payment rates. PhilHealth must implement adaptive solutions, such as emphasizing the importance of value-based care to providers and establishing a governance model to institutionalize DRGs. This will involve close collaboration with the Department of Health, an arms-length agency functioning as a case mix center, as well as engagement with providers, patient-interest groups, and the general public. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.

Suggested Citation

  • Siy Van, Vanessa T. & Uy, Jhanna & Tomas, Therese Jules P. & Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T., 2025. "Kabayarang Sapat, Serbisyong Tapat, DRG Dapat: Transitioning from PhilHealth All Case Rates to a Fairer, Responsive, and Transparent Provider Payment System (A Retrospective Policy Analysis of the All," Discussion Papers DP 2025-27, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-27
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/kabayarang-sapat-serbisyong-tapat-drg-dapat-transitioning-from-philhealth-all-case-rates-to-a-fairer-responsive-and-transparent-provider-payment-system
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Ralph M. Abrigo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.