Author
Listed:
- Santos, Kevin Carl P.
- Cagasan, Louie P. Jr.
- Loberiza, Karizza Bianca
- Tenorio, Alvin D.
- Gonzales, Ann Jelin G.
- Lapitan, May Ann B.
Abstract
This study comprehensively evaluates the national assessments administered by the Department of Education’s Bureau of Education Assessment (DepEd-BEA) to determine their effectiveness in measuring learning outcomes, along with an analysis of related practices such as test development, analysis, dissemination, and utilization of results. It begins by benchmarking current assessment practices against international standards to identify gaps and areas for enhancement. The study then examines the assessment framework to determine the extent to which the National Achievement Tests capture 21st-century skills in addition to traditional learning areas. The exit assessments are also analyzed using both Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory approaches to evaluate their quality in terms of item difficulty and discrimination. Additionally, skill audits and standard-setting activities were conducted to investigate BEA’s scoring procedures. To gain deeper insights into system operations, key informant interviews and focus group discussions were carried out to explore existing quality assurance mechanisms and how assessment results are communicated and utilized by DepEd stakeholders and the wider community. In conclusion, the study provides targeted recommendations to improve test development, strengthen quality assurance processes, and enhance the utilization and dissemination of assessment data, thereby supporting improved learning outcomes and evidence-based policy reforms. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.
Suggested Citation
Santos, Kevin Carl P. & Cagasan, Louie P. Jr. & Loberiza, Karizza Bianca & Tenorio, Alvin D. & Gonzales, Ann Jelin G. & Lapitan, May Ann B., 2025.
"Examining the DepEd’s National Assessments: A Review of Framework, Design, Development, Psychometric Properties, and Utilization,"
Discussion Papers
DP 2025-25, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Handle:
RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.25
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Ralph M. Abrigo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.