IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2025-24.html

Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Triadic Interview Data: Process Notes from a Curriculum Review

Author

Listed:
  • Abrigo, Michael R.M.
  • Lingatong, Edmar E.
  • Relos, Charlotte Marjorie L.
  • Perez, Tania Dew S.
  • Daga, Erwin Doroteo Justien C.
  • Paquibot, Jesusa L.

Abstract

This study details and reflects on the modifications made to the Framework Method for qualitative data analysis (QDA) of large-scale triadic interviews with education stakeholders. The QDA is part of the early assessment and impact evaluation of a curriculum revision that employed a mixed-methods design, including a teacher survey, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Participants were selected from schools sampled for the assessment using a cluster randomized design, which assigned schools to either the treatment or control curriculum. Given the volume of interview data and the diversity of the team, high intercoder and intracoder reliability (ICR) was aimed for when creating and applying the analytical framework, or coding tree, during data condensation and analysis. Clearly defining codes with inclusion and exclusion boundaries, segmenting the transcripts, and memoing were key processes that enhanced ICR. Evaluating the application and performance of the codes using Fleiss Kappa improved the communicability, consistency, and transparency of the working analytical framework. Memoing also helped trace points of interpretive divergence among the coding team. After coding, the segmented data was indexed in a framework matrix, utilizing relatively accessible or free tools to organize, display, and interpret the data. Through these procedures, the aim was to meet the consolidated standards for reporting qualitative data (COREQ). Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@mail.pids.gov.ph.

Suggested Citation

  • Abrigo, Michael R.M. & Lingatong, Edmar E. & Relos, Charlotte Marjorie L. & Perez, Tania Dew S. & Daga, Erwin Doroteo Justien C. & Paquibot, Jesusa L., 2025. "Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Triadic Interview Data: Process Notes from a Curriculum Review," Discussion Papers DP 2025-24, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-24
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/using-the-framework-method-for-the-analysis-of-triadic-interview-data-process-notes-from-a-curriculum-review
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Ralph M. Abrigo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.