Author
Listed:
- Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T.
- Casas, Lyle Daryll D.
- Carreon, Danielle Lois M.
- Conjares, Ma. Norma Thea Madeline
Abstract
The next 1,000 days of a child's life (spanning from the age of two to five years) offer a crucial opportunity to build on early gains and sustain or improve trajectories of healthy development. This period is vital for cognitive, motor, and socio-emotional growth. Consequently, it emphasizes nurturing care, which refers to the conditions established by public policies, programs, and services that enable caregivers and communities to ensure good health, adequate nutrition, responsive caregiving, opportunities for early learning, and safety and security. While Early Childcare and Development (ECD) interventions are not new in the Philippines, the next 1,000 days underscore the importance of continuity of care, emphasizing that the responsibility for ECD extends beyond parent-child relationships and the silos of the health and nutrition sectors. However, research involving disaggregated data during this period is limited among low- to middle-income countries, including the Philippines. Additionally, efforts to promote development in the next 1,000 days are often inadequate or not effectively translated into policies. This report aims to provide a baseline assessment of relevant outcomes during this critical period through the lens of the nurturing care framework, using population-level data covering children under the age of five. This assessment will guide the formulation of policy recommendations to enhance and build on these efforts, maximizing this golden opportunity for early child development. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@mail.pids.gov.ph.
Suggested Citation
Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T. & Casas, Lyle Daryll D. & Carreon, Danielle Lois M. & Conjares, Ma. Norma Thea Madeline, 2025.
"Sustain the Gains: An Assessment of Nurturing Care Outcomes in the Next 1,000 Days,"
Discussion Papers
DP 2025-20, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Handle:
RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.20
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Ralph M. Abrigo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.