IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2022-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Similarity in Philippine FTAs Matter in Trade?

Author

Listed:
  • Quimba, Francis Mark A.
  • Barral, Mark Anthony A.

Abstract

This study seeks to understand the design of the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement and European Free trade Association (EFTA), notably the similarities with other free trade agreements (FTAs) of Japan and EFTA-member countries, respectively, and how these similarities affect Philippine trade. To do this, the study proposes using text-of-trade-analysis, that is, text analysis employing text-as-data. The paper demonstrates the application of text analysis to complement the conventional methods of assessing the impacts of trade agreements. The results reveal that similarity across trade agreements, both at document and chapter or topic-specific provisions (e.g., trade in goods, rules of origin, strong references to sustainable development) may influence and encourage trade. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.

Suggested Citation

  • Quimba, Francis Mark A. & Barral, Mark Anthony A., 2022. "Does Similarity in Philippine FTAs Matter in Trade?," Discussion Papers DP 2022-52, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2022-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/does-similarity-in-philippine-ftas-matter-in-trade
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EFTA-PH FTA; Cosine LSA; Export; Jaccard; Free Trade Agreements; PJEPA; Non-Tariff Measures; Rules of Origin; Sustainable Development; Text Analysis; Similarity; Trade in Goods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2022-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.