IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Testing European Business cycles asymmetry

Listed author(s):
  • Zlatko J. Kovacic


    (The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, New Zealand)

  • Milos Vilotic


    (My Statistical Consultant Ltd.)

One of business cycles stylised facts is that contractions are shorter than expansions, but less persistent, more volatile and therefore asymmetric. Investigating existence and type of business cycles asymmetry is important for analysis of economic policy and statistical modeling. Economic implication of business cycles asymmetry is that economic policy should be different in period of contractions than expansion. Statistical implication is that linear models of business cycles cannot capture this stylised fact. The article has two objectives: extend the literature on the business cycles asymmetry by testing data from 36 European countries including countries never been analysed before and test robustness of the results to extraction methods and asymmetry tests used. Quarterly GDP series from Eurostat database covering period 2000q1-2016q3 were used. Series were prepared by removing seasonal component using X13-ARIMA procedure. To assess robustness of asymmetry tests results to alternative methods of detrending business cycles were extracted using two filters: Corbae-Ouliaris ideal band filter and double Hodrick-Prescott filter. For testing the deepness and steepness asymmetry three tests were used: Mills, Mira and Sichel tests. Weaker evidence of deepness asymmetry was found in Cyprus, Montenegro and Turkey cycles where all three tests statistics for both filters have negative sign. However, only for one of the tests in each country the result was statistically significant. For two other countries, Germany and Sweden, four of six tests indicated deepness asymmetry, but only one of these tests results was statistically significant. Most of the cycles show steepness asymmetry, with exception of Ireland business cycles and to certain extent cycles of Poland, Malta, Montenegro and Spain.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 2017
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institute of Economic Research in its series Working Papers with number 48/2017.

in new window

Date of creation: May 2017
Date of revision: May 2017
Handle: RePEc:pes:wpaper:2017:no48
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:wpaper:2017:no48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adam P. Balcerzak)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.