IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pdn/dispap/122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In search of unicorns: Overconfidence and missed opportunities due to stereotypical founder bias in televised startup pitch competitions

Author

Listed:
  • Livia Boerner

    (Paderborn University)

  • Bernd Frick Author-2-Name-First: Bernd Author-2-Name-Last: Frick

    (Paderborn University)

  • Thomas Fritz Author-3-Name-First: Thomas Author-3-Name-Last: Fritz

    (FH Aachen)

Abstract

This study examines investment decision accuracy and founder-related bias of angel investors in startup pitch competitions. We use a unique dataset of N = 638 pitches and investment decisions from televised German format Die Höhle der Löwen and evaluate subsequent venture performance based on survival and product-market fit. Building upon signal detection theory, two types of decision error are distinguished to explore investor bias. Our results suggest that angel investors are more likely to make overconfident (false positive) investments when ventures are pitched by more attractive entrepreneurs or family-based teams. Additionally, ventures pitched by younger, female, or less attractive teams are systematically underestimated, resulting in missed opportunities (false negative). Our study contributes to the literature by highlighting the impact of founder-related investor bias on the quality of their investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Livia Boerner & Bernd Frick Author-2-Name-First: Bernd Author-2-Name-Last: Frick & Thomas Fritz Author-3-Name-First: Thomas Author-3-Name-Last: Fritz, 2024. "In search of unicorns: Overconfidence and missed opportunities due to stereotypical founder bias in televised startup pitch competitions," Working Papers Dissertations 122, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://groups.uni-paderborn.de/wp-wiwi/RePEc/pdf/dispap/DP122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Entrepreneurial finance; Investor bias; Overconfidence; Missed opportunities; Shark tank;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WP-WiWi-Info (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwpadde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.