IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pdb/opaper/142.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Verification Options Used in Public Procurement by Apparel Sourcing Countries: Potential and Effectiveness in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Khondaker Golam Moazzem
  • Tamim Ahmed

Abstract

The objective of the study is to review the existing practices of different standards and certificates related to socially responsible public procurement (SRPP), and their potential and effectiveness in improving workers’ well-being, along with employment and workplace safety and workers’ rights in Bangladesh. An evidence-based approach, based on both primary and secondary data, has been followed in conducting the study. The study identifies a number of gaps in the process andmaintenance of certification and standards that include submission of false documents in getting certified, lack of traceability of the supply chain, inadequate disclosure of information, lack of accountability of audit firms and suppliers and ineffective measurement approach. Despite having gaps, the certification process has contributed to improving the labour standards in Bangladeshi readymade garment (RMG) factories to different extents. Human rights in the RMG industries of Bangladesh will be significantly determined by the transparency and effectiveness of the certification process.

Suggested Citation

  • Khondaker Golam Moazzem & Tamim Ahmed, 2022. "Verification Options Used in Public Procurement by Apparel Sourcing Countries: Potential and Effectiveness in Bangladesh," CPD Working Paper 142, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
  • Handle: RePEc:pdb:opaper:142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cpd.org.bd/resources/2022/03/Verification-Options-Used-in-Public-Procurement-by-Apparel-Sourcing-Countries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Apparel Sourcing Countries; readymade garment; RMG; Bangladesh garment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdb:opaper:142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Avra Bhattacharjee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cpdddbd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.