IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pau/wpaper/0401.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toward an Understanding of global knomledge Management (KM) Practices : a preliminary investigation of KM in France and the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Anne NELSON

    (Groupe ESC Pau)

  • Roland SABATIER

    (Groupe ESC Pau)

  • William Nelson

    (University of Liverpool, England)

Abstract

In the past decade, a business strategy called knowledge management (KM) has evolved to sytematically acquire, store, access, share, maintain, and reuse knowledge from different sources. Within this effort has emerged an attempt to formalize the behavior of knowledge sharing. This study investigated the phenomenon of formalized knowledge sharing within a KM effort. A formalized setting is one where the knowledge sharing within a KM effort. A formalized setting is one where the knowledge sharing does not occur through serendipity. Rather an employee seeking information utililizes a formal KM tool or process such as a map of internal expertise or an organizationally supported community of practice, to engage in knowledge sharing. The purpose of this study was two-fold, it sought to identify what motivates employees to participate in formalized knowledge sharing. Second, it sought to identify and understand the effects of formalized knowledge sharing on the sharer. In particular, the study investigated whether the antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior(Organ, 1988) served as motivators for formalized knowledge sharing behaviors.It also employed research from the areas of impression management and knowledge sharing culture to help understand the sharer's motivations. Guided by social learning theory (Bandura, 1977), the study exmplored sharers' perceptions of personal and environmental effects that they attribute to the formalized knowledge sharing behavior.Methodologically, the study used a multi-site, multi-country (France and the United States) case study approach. Data were elicited via self-administered questionnaires, and in-depth, semi-structures interviews at four organizations, two small and two large, in firms of corresponding size and structure in France and the U.S. The study's findings show multiple motivators engaged respondents at the organizations to participate and share in formalized knowledge sharing was identified via the interview. On the other hand, the role of social exchange and personal/organizational norms in the display of formalized knowledge sharing was identified via the surveys. The study's findings also show respondents perceived multiple effects when they partake in formalized knowledge-sharing activities. The study made contributions to several existing theories and proposed a two-factor theory of motivation for formalized knowledge sharing. The study's findings also had several pragmatic implications for the sharers, developers, and designers of KM initiatives, and managers and leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne NELSON & Roland SABATIER & William Nelson, 2005. "Toward an Understanding of global knomledge Management (KM) Practices : a preliminary investigation of KM in France and the U.S," Working Papers 0401, Groupe ESC Pau, Research Department, revised Jan 2005.
  • Handle: RePEc:pau:wpaper:0401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.esc-pau.fr/faculte-recherche/documents/cahiers/cahier_recherche4_escpau.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1996
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge; management; KM;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pau:wpaper:0401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florent DEISTING (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escpufr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.