IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/xzjb9_v1.html

Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence. Use and Evaluation of AI in the Workplace—A Question of Occupational Class: Brief Report on a Segmentation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lünich, Marco
  • Keller, Birte
  • Flaßhoff, Florian Golo
  • Marcinkowski, Frank

Abstract

This brief report presents the key findings of a segmentation study conducted in June 2025 as part of the research project Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence 3.0. It analyzes the attitudes, assessments, and reactions of 1,987 working people in Germany toward the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, differentiated by occupational class based on the Oesch classification. The results show marked differences between occupational classes. Higher-skilled and technically oriented groups evaluate AI more positively, see greater potential professional benefits, and report fewer concerns about stress and substitution. Occupational classes with organizational or interpersonal work logic and lower skill levels, on the other hand, react more ambivalently and express concerns more frequently, particularly with regard to data protection, social contacts, and the general replaceability of human labor. Across all occupational classes, the potential for AI to reduce workloads and improve health and safety is recognized, while resistance and protest tendencies remain moderate overall. Overall, the findings illustrate that perceptions of AI in the workplace are strongly influenced by professional position, work logic, and qualifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lünich, Marco & Keller, Birte & Flaßhoff, Florian Golo & Marcinkowski, Frank, 2026. "Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence. Use and Evaluation of AI in the Workplace—A Question of Occupational Class: Brief Report on a Segmentation Study," SocArXiv xzjb9_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xzjb9_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/xzjb9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69bc1a8bd9f1ebc3a83aa0f0/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/xzjb9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xzjb9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.