Author
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a systematic assessment of the ‘red circle and white chairs’ incident at Wuhan University's 2025 commencement ceremony and its broader context within Sino-Japanese exchanges through open-source intelligence (OSINT) methodologies. The objective is to uncover potential cultural narrative risks and pathways of external influence. Methodologically, the study combines Competitive Hypothesis Analysis (CHA) with red team logic modelling, embedding the STEMPLES framework (Symbols, Timing, Events, Information, Processes, Leadership, Externalities, Structure) to conduct a multidimensional analysis of the event's symbolic risks, narrative imbalances, process vulnerabilities, and leadership behaviour. Findings indicate that the Wuhan University Party Committee's high-frequency exchanges with Japan between 2019 and 2025, coupled with the semi-autonomous operational mechanism of the Japanese alumni association, provided ‘soft influence pathways’ for cultural infiltration and misinterpretation of public discourse. The ‘red circle + white chair’ design, interpreted by the public as symbolising the ‘Japanese flag,’ exposed deficiencies in political sensitivity oversight during major ceremonies. Although no conclusive hostile intelligence networks or financial irregularities were identified, evidence indicates that uncontrolled symbolism and narrative gaps amplified opportunities for external narrative manipulation. In conclusion, this paper advocates establishing cross-departmental risk mitigation mechanisms to strengthen political security reviews of visual and narrative design. This should form a closed-loop system comprising ‘pre-event screening, in-process intervention, and symmetrical post-event responses’ to prevent symbolic missteps from strategic exploitation. Such measures offer valuable insights for universities' security governance in international cooperation and cultural exchange.
Suggested Citation
Meng, Wei, 2025.
"Wuhan University,China“Sun Flag Incident”: An OSINT Analysis Report,"
SocArXiv
wc9us_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:socarx:wc9us_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wc9us_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wc9us_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.