IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/w47ct.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labor and Delivery Unit Closures in Rural Georgia from 2012–2016 and the Impact on Black Women: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Daymude, Anna E. C.
  • Daymude, Joshua J.
  • Rochat, Roger

Abstract

Background. Obstetric provider coverage in rural Georgia has worsened, with nine rural labor and delivery units (LDUs) closing outside the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area from 2012–2016. Georgia consistently has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the nation and faces increased adverse health consequences from this decline in obstetric care. Objective. This study explores what factors may be associated with rural hospital LDU closures in Georgia from 2012–2016. Methods. This study describes differences between rural Georgia hospitals based on LDU closure status through a quantitative analysis of 2011 baseline regional, hospital, and patient data, and a qualitative analysis of newspaper articles addressing the closures. Results. LDUs that closed had higher proportions of Black female residents in their Primary Care Service Areas (PCSAs), of Black birthing patients, and of patients with Medicaid, self-pay or other government insurance; lower LDU birth volume; more women giving birth within their PCSA of residence; fewer obstetricians and obstetric provider equivalents per LDU; and fewer average annual births per obstetric provider. Qualitative results indicate financial distress primarily contributed to closures, but also suggest that low birth volume and obstetric provider shortage impacted closures. Conclusions for Practice. Rural LDU closure in Georgia has a disproportionate impact on Black and low-income women and may be prevented through funding maternity healthcare and addressing provider shortages.

Suggested Citation

  • Daymude, Anna E. C. & Daymude, Joshua J. & Rochat, Roger, 2021. "Labor and Delivery Unit Closures in Rural Georgia from 2012–2016 and the Impact on Black Women: A Mixed-Methods Investigation," SocArXiv w47ct, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:w47ct
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/w47ct
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6189c29b03b825003a6ddeda/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/w47ct?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:w47ct. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.