IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/v9nj3_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Do Civil Servants Delegate Empathic Engagement with Clients to Artificial Intelligence Systems? Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • König, Pascal
  • Weißmüller, Kristina Sabrina

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

What factors lie behind bureaucrats’ readiness to delegate client interactions that commonly involve human empathy to artificial intelligence (AI) systems? Such delegation entails a crucial trade-off as it may reduce workload but simultaneously introduces inauthentic empathic engagement in citizen-state relations, which may undermine the moral integrity of public administration (PA). Drawing on bureaucratic legitimacy theory, this study tests the impact of efficiency gains, AI features, and organizational norms on civil servants’ willingness to delegate citizen engagement to AI. Findings from a pre-registered discrete choice experiment conducted with 300 active German civil servants (Obs.=3,000) show that while efficiency gains and norms do have some impact, utilitarian considerations concerning AI’s ability to serve clients well are clearly the most important motivator. The findings show that the acceptability of delegating empathic engagement with citizens to AI can be tied to key dimensions of bureaucratic legitimacy, and provide novel evidence that the delegation of counselling to AI in PA is more strongly linked with public service motivation rather than self-serving efficiency gains. These insights advance theory and inform responsible and client-centered use of AI in public bureaucracies.

Suggested Citation

  • König, Pascal & Weißmüller, Kristina Sabrina, 2025. "Why Do Civil Servants Delegate Empathic Engagement with Clients to Artificial Intelligence Systems? Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment," SocArXiv v9nj3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:v9nj3_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/v9nj3_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/691f5422495579815777070c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/v9nj3_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:v9nj3_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.