IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/uj9x6_v1.html

The Accountability Gap in Sub-Sovereign ESG Finance: A Case Study of Police Administration Oversight in Chiba Prefecture, Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Miyazawa, Takashi

Abstract

This paper examines a critical vulnerability in the methodology of sub-sovereign ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings, utilizing Chiba Prefecture, Japan, as a primary case study. While global ESG frameworks increasingly evaluate local government bonds, rating agencies predominantly rely on macro-level socioeconomic indicators and overarching policy frameworks, creating a significant "measurement gap." We demonstrate how this macro-dependence obscures micro-level governance failures—specifically, the indefinite suspension of complaint processing and the systemic non-creation of official records within police administration. By applying an axiomatic approach grounded in administrative law and corporate governance principles, this study empirically documents the existence of a structural "Accountability Gap" at the operational entry point. The findings highlight the critical need for institutional investors and ESG rating agencies to discount the reliability of sub-sovereign sustainability representations when auditable management evidence is structurally absent.

Suggested Citation

  • Miyazawa, Takashi, 2026. "The Accountability Gap in Sub-Sovereign ESG Finance: A Case Study of Police Administration Oversight in Chiba Prefecture, Japan," SocArXiv uj9x6_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uj9x6_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/uj9x6_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a9910be8c8f15f9422a9ce4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/uj9x6_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flammer, Caroline, 2021. "Corporate green bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 499-516.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    3. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    4. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    5. Painter, Marcus, 2020. "An inconvenient cost: The effects of climate change on municipal bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 468-482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Lin & Wang, Jiali & Lin, Zhongguo & Du, Huibin, 2025. "Official environmental credit evaluation and corporate debt concentration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    2. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    3. Zhu, Jialei & Xiong, Zhengde & Lu, Xinxin & Yao, Zhu, 2025. "Does ESG rating disagreement impede corporate green innovation?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Ali, Amjad & Usman, Muhammad & Ahmad, Khalil, 2025. "Environmental Risks and Sovereign Credit Ratings: Evidence from Developed and Developing Economies," MPRA Paper 127543, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2024. "ESG reputation risks, cash holdings, and payout policies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella & Santilli, Gianluca, 2023. "Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the European banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Hu, Xinwen & Hua, Renhai & Liu, Qingfu & Wang, Chuanjie, 2023. "The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Xiao, Zhongyi & Shum, Wai Yan & Lai, Fujun & Xiang, Cheng, 2025. "How do firms respond to divergent ESG ratings? The perspective of green innovation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Fuxiu Jiang & Jia Ma & Xiaojia Zheng, 2025. "Multiple large shareholders and ESG performance: Evidence from the cost‐sharing and resource‐provision view," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(2), pages 1309-1346, June.
    10. Liu, Xiangqiang & Peng, Yuling & Li, Qinyang & Wu, Chu-Hua, 2025. "CEO pay structure and ESG rating disagreement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Qiu, Xincan & Gan, Xiaolin & Zhang, Chenglong, 2026. "Generative AI–based readability as a measure of disclosure quality: Evidence from ESG rating divergence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Alam, Zinat & Hossain, Miran & Wang, Lingling, 2025. "The economic and cultural motives of green price premium," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    13. Maretno A. Harjoto & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Marcus A. Nilsson, 2022. "Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1301, November.
    14. Wang, Shuangshi & Yan, Cheng & Zhao, Yuqian, 2024. "Technological peer pressure and corporate sustainability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye & Su, Zhi & Guo, Hongliang, 2025. "Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Chaudhry, Neeru & Dhawan, Priya, 2025. "Does firms' commitment towards CSR influence idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from India," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    18. D’Amico, Stefania & Klausmann, Johannes & Pancost, N. Aaron, 2026. "The benchmark greenium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Li, Suyang & Qiao, Lu & Ren, Boru & Wang, Zilong, 2025. "Financing sustainability: Sustainable institutional investors and bank loan access," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uj9x6_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.