IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/rmvqu_v1.html

Prompt Dependency: Cognitive Outsourcing, AI Reliance, and Expertise Performance Among Generative AI Users

Author

Listed:
  • Danny, Lauren

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence integration into professional workflows alter the landscape of cognitive labor and knowledge production. Utilizing a qualitative study of 45 knowledge workers across technology and creative sectors, this research investigates the shifting boundaries of professional autonomy. We propose the notion of Prompt Dependency, defined as the systemic erosion of self-directed analytical capacity resulting from the habitual delegation of complex problem-solving to large language models. Users they perceive these tools as efficiency enhancers, but our analysis reveals an inversion of agency where the mastery of algorithmic interaction begins to supersede the mastery of the domain itself. Findings indicate that participants experience reduced critical synthesis and increased reliance on automated heuristics. Further observations it suggest the atrophy of foundational domain skills and a normalization of algorithmic output as a baseline for professional truth. By mapping these dimensions, we demonstrate that the efficiency gains of AI are paradoxically tethered to a long-term degradation of individual expertise. These results suggest that organizational policies must prioritize cognitive resilience or human-in-the-loop verification to mitigate the risks of structural deskilling in the age of automated cognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Danny, Lauren, 2026. "Prompt Dependency: Cognitive Outsourcing, AI Reliance, and Expertise Performance Among Generative AI Users," SocArXiv rmvqu_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rmvqu_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rmvqu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a5f8c384a61f68110f5ff47/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/rmvqu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rmvqu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.