Author
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence is growing in the domain of cyber-enabled financial crime detection and has created a significant accountability gap: AI models have been increasingly influencing the regulatory compliance outcomes, and yet their logic is opaque to the humans who are experts and bear legal responsibility for decisions (International Monetary Fund, 2026; Radončić, 2026). Instead of designing AI models to be transparent from their foundation, institutions add the layer of post-hoc explanations onto the autonomous or semi-autonomous AI models (European Commission, 2021; FATF, 2021). Recent research on interactive AI shows analysts prefer to interact and be actively involved with the systems rather than passively consume the outputs (Raees et al., 2024; Wang, 2019). This paper argues that, in high-risk domains such as anti-money laundering, cyber-enabled financial fraud, and cybercrimes, AI should function as a rule-based and human-in-the-loop decision-support system which structures evidence and applies typologies, rules, and auditable variables to support risk assessments while retaining human judgement for final decisions (Bank for International Settlements, 2025; Fink, 2025). This paper introduces TRACE (Transaction Risk Analysis and Compliance Engine) as an interactive AI; it is the manifestation of the compliance-by-design principle. TRACE integrates a transparent rule-based support engine and mandatory human analysts’ approval into a single compliance-grade architecture. In this design, the AI only suggests the risk scoring and flags up factors. To provide support for analysts to make decisions without compromising on transparency, TRACE integrates an auditable retrieval module that draws upon the curated regulated knowledge base, such as FATF, RBI guidelines, and national KYC derivatives. Upon analyst request, contextual evidence, and surfacing retrieved snippets with reliable sources, it remains separate from rule-based scoring or risk narratives (Johnson et al., 2021; Lewis et al., 2020; Saison Technology, 2026). The grounds on which TRACE operates are using the foundational principles of ethics and responsible AI. The risk alerts are flagged using transparency and precise regulatory standards with the aim of mitigating demographic bias in compliance assessments. As it strictly functions as a compliance support tool and not as any enforcement system, it reflects a clear commitment towards responsible AI in this domain, where errors carry serious consequences (AML RightSource, 2024; European Commission, 2021).
Suggested Citation
Prabhala, Himaja, 2026.
"TRACE: An Interactive AI and Compliance-by-Design Framework for Financial Crime Detection,"
SocArXiv
r9jdm_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:socarx:r9jdm_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/r9jdm_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:r9jdm_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.