IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/mpzt7_v1.html

Comparing Information Disorder Policy: The Global Disinformation Policy Database, 2000–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Ryan

Abstract

Comparative research on information disorder policy faces a dependent-variable problem: policies sharing a label differ in what they regulate, and policies regulating the same conduct carry different labels. The Global Disinformation Policy Database (GDPD) addresses this problem, coding 364 policies from 132 countries, 2000–2023, and decomposing each into label, information quality, regulated behavior, and intent standard. The decomposition shows that 57.7% of “disinformation” policies specify no intent standard, that policy growth predates the literature’s 2016 watershed, and that instruments have diversified away from criminal sanction along regional lines. The GDPD enables researchers to compare how governments conceptualize contested information.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Ryan, 2026. "Comparing Information Disorder Policy: The Global Disinformation Policy Database, 2000–2023," SocArXiv mpzt7_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mpzt7_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/mpzt7_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a834a1742de8a4a92d41e0f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/mpzt7_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mpzt7_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.