IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/jqmx9_v1.html

The Climate Conflict Vulnerability Index: Mapping Global (Co-)occurrence of Climate and Conflict Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Mittermaier, Daniel
  • Merschroth, Simon
  • Auer, Cornelia
  • Bohne, Tobias
  • Ferri, Stefano
  • Gottwick, Vanessa
  • Michelini, Sidney
  • Slouma, Sana
  • Racek, Daniel
  • Šedová, Barbora

Abstract

Climate and conflict hazards both threaten human security, and where they coincide their effects may compound. Yet global risk assessments often lack transparency and do not clearly distinguish between climate risk, conflict risk, and the vulnerabilities that shape both. We introduce the Climate Conflict Vulnerability Index (CCVI) to assess where, to what extent, and under which conditions climate and conflict risks (co-)occur. The CCVI is a global index at 0.5° x 0.5° spatial resolution and updated quarterly and harmonizes a wide range of indicators based on publicly available data to create measures of climate and conflict risk together with a combined score identifying places exposed to both. Applying the index globally, we find that combined climate-conflict risk is generally low to moderate, but highly concentrated in specific regions, with the highest levels observed in Africa between the Sahel belt and the equator. We further show that climate and conflict risks are spatially correlated in an asymmetric way: high conflict risk rarely occurs where climate risk is low, whereas high climate risk occurs across the full range of conflict risk. By separating shared vulnerability from climate and conflict hazards, the CCVI helps identify location-specific risk profiles. It constitutes an openly accessible, transparent tool for comparing climate-conflict risk patterns across sub-national regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Mittermaier, Daniel & Merschroth, Simon & Auer, Cornelia & Bohne, Tobias & Ferri, Stefano & Gottwick, Vanessa & Michelini, Sidney & Slouma, Sana & Racek, Daniel & Šedová, Barbora, 2026. "The Climate Conflict Vulnerability Index: Mapping Global (Co-)occurrence of Climate and Conflict Risk," SocArXiv jqmx9_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jqmx9_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/jqmx9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69ef30efcbfc63301b62ee80/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/jqmx9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krichene, H. & Geiger, T. & Frieler, K. & Willner, S.N. & Sauer, I. & Otto, C., 2021. "Long-term impacts of tropical cyclones and fluvial floods on economic growth – Empirical evidence on transmission channels at different levels of development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Laura A. Bakkensen & Cate Fox‐Lent & Laura K. Read & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 982-1004, May.
    3. Katharine J. Mach & Caroline M. Kraan & W. Neil Adger & Halvard Buhaug & Marshall Burke & James D. Fearon & Christopher B. Field & Cullen S. Hendrix & Jean-Francois Maystadt & John O’Loughlin & Philip, 2019. "Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7764), pages 193-197, July.
    4. Bartusevičius, Henrikas & Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, 2019. "A Two-Stage Approach to Civil Conflict: Contested Incompatibilities and Armed Violence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 225-248, January.
    5. Brandon Ives & Jacob S. Lewis, 2020. "From Rallies to Riots: Why Some Protests Become Violent," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(5), pages 958-986, May.
    6. M. Saisana & A. Saltelli & S. Tarantola, 2005. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(2), pages 307-323, March.
    7. Vesco, Paola & Baliki, Ghassan & Brück, Tilman & Döring, Stefan & Eriksson, Anneli & Fjelde, Hanne & Guha-Sapir, Debarati & Hall, Jonathan & Knutsen, Carl Henrik & Leis, Maxine R. & Mueller, Hannes & , 2025. "The impacts of armed conflict on human development: A review of the literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Nina von Uexkull & Halvard Buhaug, 2021. "Security implications of climate change: A decade of scientific progress," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(1), pages 3-17, January.
    9. Matthias Garschagen & Deepal Doshi & Jonathan Reith & Michael Hagenlocher, 2021. "Global patterns of disaster and climate risk—an analysis of the consistency of leading index-based assessments and their results," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Nils B. Weidmann, 2016. "A Closer Look at Reporting Bias in Conflict Event Data," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 206-218, January.
    11. Marshall Burke & Joel Ferguson & Solomon M. Hsiang & Edward Miguel, 2024. "New Evidence on the Economics of Climate and Conflict," NBER Working Papers 33040, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Stojetz & Tilman Brück & Carlo Azzarri & Erdgin Mane, 2025. "Polycrisis in Agrifood Systems: Climate-Conflict Interactions and Labor Dynamics for Women and Youth in 21 African Countries," HiCN Working Papers 430, Households in Conflict Network.
    2. Tobias Ide & Anders Kristensen & Henrikas BartuseviÄ ius, 2021. "First comes the river, then comes the conflict? A qualitative comparative analysis of flood-related political unrest," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(1), pages 83-97, January.
    3. Niklas Hänze, 2025. "When conflict becomes calamity: Understanding the role of armed conflict dynamics in natural disasters," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1030-1045, July.
    4. Nathaniel Jensen & Jose Lopez-Rivas & Karlijn Morsink & Emma Rikken, 2025. "Weathering Conflict: The Effect of Resource Shocks on Livestock Raids," CSAE Working Paper Series 2025-02, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    5. Ruben Dahm & Karen Meijer & Ernst Kuneman & Louise Schaik, 2023. "What climate? The different meaning of climate indicators in violent conflict studies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(11), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Espen Geelmuyden Rød & Håvard Hegre & Maxine Leis, 2025. "Predicting armed conflict using protest data," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(1), pages 3-20, January.
    7. Deepti Joshi & Regina Werum & Dalton Hazelwood & Shawn Ratcliff & Ashok Samal & Leen-Kiat Soh, 2025. "Deduplication of the media-based event databases," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Stojetz, Wolfgang & Ronzani, Piero & Pinay, Jeanne & d’Errico, Marco & Brück, Tilman, 2026. "Shocking social safety: Evidence from violence and drought in North-east Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Nina Uexkull & Halvard Buhaug, 2025. "Scientific uptake in United Nations Security Council debates on climate change and security," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Cuesta Leiva, Jose Antonio & Huff, Connor, 2026. "Climate and Social Sustainability in Fragility, Conflict, and Violence Contexts," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11283, The World Bank.
    11. Pierre E. Biscaye, 2025. "Agricultural shocks and long-term conflict risk: Evidence from desert locust swarms," HiCN Working Papers 436, Households in Conflict Network.
    12. André Tashi Gasser & Bruno Lanz, 2025. "Countervailing Effects of Extreme Maximum and Minimum Temperature Days on Conflict in Mainland Southeast Asia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(12), pages 3805-3839, December.
    13. Kyosuke Kikuta & Yuta Kamahara, 2025. "Environmental protection after civil war: A difference-in-geographic-discontinuity approach," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(3), pages 738-752, May.
    14. Katharine J Mach & Caroline M Kraan, 2021. "Science–policy dimensions of research on climate change and conflict," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(1), pages 168-176, January.
    15. Benjamin J Appel & Nathaniel C Smith, 2025. "Rainfall shocks and state repression: How rainfall shocks incentivize governments to commit human rights abuses," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(5), pages 488-513, September.
    16. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    17. Matthias Firgo & Fabian Gabelberger & Andreas Reinstaller & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2024. "Assessing Regional Production Potential to Strengthen the Security of Supply in Strategic Products," WIFO Working Papers 670, WIFO.
    18. Pearce Edwards & Patrick Pierson, 2023. "Incumbent-Aligned Terrorism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Argentina’s 1973 Elections," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(4), pages 672-700, April.
    19. Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
    20. Mueller, Hannes & Rauh, Christopher, 2018. "Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(2), pages 358-375, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jqmx9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.