IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/jmru2_v1.html

When Central Banks Go Green: Public Opinion and Monetary Policy Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Bremer, Björn

    (Central European University)

  • Chwieroth, Jeffrey
  • Mancosu, Anita

Abstract

Climate change presents unelected central banks with an acute dilemma: acting on climate change risks charges of mandate overreach, while failing to act risks charges of institutional failure. Yet public opinion on green central banking remains un- studied. We address this gap with two survey experiments in Germany and the Netherlands. A conjoint experiment shows that adding environmental condition- ality to corporate bond purchases significantly increases support for quantitative easing, suggesting that greening can rehabilitate contested unconventional policies. A framing experiment reveals that institutional objections about price stability and democratic legitimacy erode support more than distributive objections about job losses or asset devaluation, inverting expectations from the climate politics literature. Respondents who trust the central bank most are paradoxically most responsive to arguments for and against it. Public trust in delegated institutions is thus not a blank check; it is a license granted on terms, policed most attentively by the institution’s own supporters.

Suggested Citation

  • Bremer, Björn & Chwieroth, Jeffrey & Mancosu, Anita, 2026. "When Central Banks Go Green: Public Opinion and Monetary Policy Legitimacy," SocArXiv jmru2_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jmru2_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/jmru2_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a41386769d7843cec9df2a8/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/jmru2_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matto Mildenberger & Erick Lachapelle & Kathryn Harrison & Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen, 2022. "Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(2), pages 141-147, February.
    2. Francesco Vona, 2019. "Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 524-532, April.
    3. Lucia Quaglia & Amy Verdun, 2025. "Introduction: the new political economy of central banks: reluctant Atlases?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 625-638, September.
    4. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    5. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Wing Thye Woo & Naoyuki Yoshino & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2019. "Why Is Green Finance Important?," ADBI Working Papers 917, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    6. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria & Galanis, Giorgos, 2018. "Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 219-234.
    7. Colgan, Jeff D. & Green, Jessica F. & Hale, Thomas N., 2021. "Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 586-610, February.
    8. Baer, Moritz & Campiglio, Emanuele & Deyris, Jérôme, 2021. "It takes two to dance: Institutional dynamics and climate-related financial policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Leeper, Thomas J. & Hobolt, Sara B. & Tilley, James, 2020. "Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 207-221, April.
    10. Leeper, Thomas J. & Hobolt, Sara & Tilley, James, 2020. "Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Jérôme Deyris, 2023. "Too green to be true? Forging a climate consensus at the European Central Bank," Post-Print hal-04638404, HAL.
    12. Dietsch, Peter, 2020. "Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 591-595, May.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6d7es28iae9pjoil7092hs41h3 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Beiser-McGrath, Liam & Bernauer, Thomas, 2024. "How do pocketbook and distributional concerns affect citizens’ preferences for carbon taxation?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120995, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Emanuele Campiglio & Frederick van der Ploeg, 2022. "Macrofinancial Risks of the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 173-195.
    16. Jérôme Deyris, 2023. "Too green to be true? Forging a climate consensus at the European Central Bank," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 713-730, September.
    17. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    18. Michaël Aklin & Matto Mildenberger, 2020. "Prisoners of the Wrong Dilemma: Why Distributive Conflict, Not Collective Action, Characterizes the Politics of Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 4-27, Autumn.
    19. Bauer, Michael & Huber, Daniel & Rudebusch, Glenn & Wilms, Ole, 2022. "Where is the carbon premium? Global performance of green and brown stocks," Other publications TiSEM 6b117156-316d-440a-9fa5-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Stefano Carattini & Steffen Kallbekken & Anton Orlov, 2019. "How to win public support for a global carbon tax," Nature, Nature, vol. 565(7739), pages 289-291, January.
    21. Gaikwad, Nikhar & Genovese, Federica & Tingley, Dustin, 2022. "Creating Climate Coalitions: Mass Preferences for Compensating Vulnerability in the World’s Two Largest Democracies," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(4), pages 1165-1183, November.
    22. Eric Helleiner & Monica DiLeo & Jens van 't Klooster, 2025. "Financial technocrats as competitive regime creators: The founding and design of the Network for Greening the Financial System," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 901-916, July.
    23. Dreher, Axel & Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Haan, Jakob de, 2010. "When is a central bank governor replaced? Evidence based on a new data set," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 766-781, September.
    24. Lukas Haffert & Nils Redeker & Tobias Rommel, 2021. "Misremembering Weimar: Hyperinflation, the Great Depression, and German collective economic memory," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 664-686, November.
    25. Peter Andre & Teodora Boneva & Felix Chopra & Armin Falk, 2024. "Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(3), pages 253-259, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindgren, Oskar & Jagers, Sverker C. & Lindvall, Daniel, 2026. "The impact of policy design on opposition to restrictive climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Adrien Fabre & Thomas Douenne & Linus Mattauch, 2025. "Majority support for global redistributive and climate policies," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(8), pages 1583-1594, August.
    3. Lim, Sijeong & Dolsak, Nives & Prakash, Aseem & Tanaka, Seiki, 2022. "Distributional concerns and public opinion: EV subsidies in the U.S. and Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Hanna Schwander & Jonas Fischer, 2025. "From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 303-328, April.
    5. Sung Eun Kim & Seung Yeob Kim & Junwoo Suh, 2024. "Public support for carbon tax in South Korea: The role of tax design and revenue recycling," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), May.
    6. Campiglio, Emanuele & Deyris, Jérôme & Romelli, Davide & Scalisi, Ginevra, 2025. "Warning words in a warming world: Central bank communication and climate change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Emanuele Campiglio & Jérôme Deyris & Davide Romelli & Ginevra Scalisi, 2025. "Warning words in a warming world: central bank communication and climate change," Working Papers hal-04978072, HAL.
    8. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    9. Caroline Vincensini, 2026. "After 25 years of reforms of economic policy governance, is EMU fit to address the climate challenge? A political economy view," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Tukiainen, Janne & Blesse, Sebastian & Bohne, Albrecht & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Jääskeläinen, Jan & Luukinen, Ari & Sieppi, Antti, 2024. "What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Fumiya Uchikoshi & Hirofumi Miwa & Yoshikuni Ono, 2025. "Gendered Expectations for College Applications: Experimental Evidence from a Gender Inegalitarian Education Context," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(5), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Montfort Simon, 2023. "Key predictors for climate policy support and political mobilization: The role of beliefs and preferences," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Sayaka Usui & Benjamin K. Blevins, 2025. "Investing in the Future of Djibouti: A Choice-based Conjoint Analysis for Youth Employment Preferences," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    14. Michael J. Frith, 2021. "Analysing conjoint experiments in Stata: the conjoint command," London Stata Conference 2021 14, Stata Users Group.
    15. Avidit Acharya & Jens Hainmueller & Yiqing Xu, 2026. "Learning Preferences from Conjoint Data: A Hybrid Structural Deep Learning Approach," Papers 2604.10845, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    16. Kim, Sung Eun & Park, Jong Hee & Rhee, Inbok & Yang, Joonseok, 2025. "What do aid recipients want? Public attitudes toward foreign aid in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. Liza G. Steele & Laird Gallagher, 2025. "Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Refugees During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 2593-2627, December.
    18. Ruprecht, Sophie & Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, 2025. "Going solar? The role of knowledge in shaping social acceptance of citizen-financed PV projects in Switzerland," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Chu, Haoran & Liu, Sixiao, 2021. "Light at the end of the tunnel: Influence of vaccine availability and vaccination intention on people’s consideration of the COVID-19 vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    20. Hsu Yumin Wang & Stefano Jud & Will Giles, 2025. "Does shaming make non-compliance with international court rulings costlier? Evidence from China," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(7), pages 2445-2453, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jmru2_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.