IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/gxvq2_v1.html

Notified Bodies in the AI Act: regulatory intermediaries with a de facto gatekeeping role

Author

Listed:
  • Kamara, Irene

    (Tilburg Law School)

  • Medzini, Rotem

Abstract

This paper examines the significant yet underexplored role of notified bodies within the EU AI Act. These conformity assessment entities, once designated by national authorities and notified to the European Commission, are tasked with determining whether high-risk AI systems meet legal requirements to enter the EU market or put into service. Positioned between state regulators and providers of high-risk AI systems, notified bodies function as de facto gatekeepers, with the authority to allow or deny market access. Drawing on gatekeeping theory and regulatory governance literature, the paper conceptualises notified bodies as regulatory intermediaries who wield gatekeeping power despite not being state actors. The paper analyses their functions, accountability, and overall role, highlighting tensions arising from their quasi-public responsibilities and private nature. The paper argues for stronger safeguards to ensure legitimacy, transparency, and fundamental rights protection

Suggested Citation

  • Kamara, Irene & Medzini, Rotem, 2026. "Notified Bodies in the AI Act: regulatory intermediaries with a de facto gatekeeping role," SocArXiv gxvq2_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gxvq2_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/gxvq2_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a7c16e1c4814e43bbb89a66/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/gxvq2_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gxvq2_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.